Bladder carcinoma (BCa) is the seventh most common cancer in the male population and the eleventh most common in women worldwide. The age-standardized incidence rate is 9.0 for men and 2.2 for women , . In the European Union, the age-standardized incidence rate is 19.1 in men and 4.0 in women , .
Histologically, 90% of bladder tumors are of urothelial origin, 5% are squamous cell carcinomas, and less than 2% are adenocarcinomas or other variants .
From all urothelial BCa at presentation, approximately 70% are non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), of these, 70% present in stage Ta, 20% as T1, and 10% as CIS (carcinoma in situ) . These tumors are grouped into the definition of NMIBC, because they can be treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and/or intravesical instillations.
To facilitate treatment recommendations, it is important to categorize patients according to risk groups. The standard classification, which is recommended by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on bladder cancer is based on available prognostic factors and in particular data from the EORTC risk tables, and it divides patients into three groups (Table 1).
|Risk group stratification||Low-risk||Intermediate-risk||High-risk|
TaG1 (PULNLMP, LG),
<3 cm, no CIS
|All tumors not defined in other categories||Any of the following:
-T1, G3 (HG),
-Multiple, recurrent, and large (>3cm) TaG1-G2/LG
Depending on the stage and grade, the number and size of tumors, the probability of recurrence of NMIBC can be as high as 60% in the first year and 80% at 5 years after diagnosis. Low-grade Ta tumors have a 50% to 70% recurrence rate, and progress in approximately 5% of cases. In contrast to high-grade T1 tumors that can recur in up to 80%, and progress in up to 50% of patients within 3 years , , .
The EAU guidelines recommend the administration of an immediate post-operative instillation of chemotherapy (IPOIC) after TURBT in patients with bladder tumors that are presumed to be NMIBC of low or intermediate risk, that have a low recurrence rate (less than one at one year) and an expected EORTC (European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer) recurrence score < 5 (Level of evidence: 1 a. Grade of recommendation: A) . In the United States, the same practice is recommended by the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines .
This recommendation is based on the results of four large meta-analyzes which have consistently shown that IPOIC after TURB reduces recurrences compared to TURBT alone , , , . On the other hand, contraindications of an IPOIC include: a confirmed or suspected intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal bladder perforation, a wide or extensive resection, or the requirement of continuous intravesical irrigation due to hematuria . Ideally, an IPOIC should be administered within the first 24 hours after surgery (preferably within 2 hours) and it should last for 1–2 hours .
Although no comparative studies have been performed between different chemotherapeutic agents, mitomycin C (MMC), epirubicin, and pirarubicin have shown similar beneficial effects , , , . Moreover, in addition to an IPOIC, the benefit of continuous irrigation with normal saline has shown efficacy in two meta-analyzes , .
The rational explanation for the effectiveness of an IPOIC is based on its antitumor effect in the resection site, in destroying floating cells that can implant further on, and in destroying small tumors that have been overlooked , .
Despite the previous growing evidence that an IPOIC reduces recurrences of NMIBC, many urologists worldwide still do not apply it in their daily practice, due to the fact that in a considerable number of patients (approximately 2 out of 3), the presence of post-operative hematuria or the extent and/or depth of the resection contraindicates this practice , , . So technically, this practice can only be performed in approximately 30% of patients who undergo a TURBT.
Studies which have analyzed the use of an IPOIC have shown that in the United States, only 0.33–45% of patients who underwent a TURBT for suspected NMIBC received it, and that around 66% of urologists do not use it , , . Meanwhile, in 5 European countries (Germany, Spain, France, Italy, United Kingdom), only 56.7% of patients received it, and 28% of urologists do not use it . In the previously mentioned studies, authors describe possible justifications for not performing this routine practice, such as: problems with low reimbursement, difficulties in preparing chemotherapy drugs and delivering them to the operating room on time, lack of organization, insufficient training of the nursing staff in the use of chemotherapy, among others , , , . Furthermore, the lack of scientific evidence of its usefulness in intermediate and high-risk tumors may contribute to the non-compliance of this step in the treatment of NMIBC.
The role of an immediate neoadjuvant instillation of chemotherapy (INAIC) has not been studied other than in a prospective, randomized clinical trial using an electromotive drug administration device (EMDA) with MMC . In this study published by Di Stasi in 2011, it was found that patients who received neoadjuvant MMC with EMDA experienced a longer disease-free interval compared to TURBT alone, and TURB plus IPOIC: 51 months versus 16 months versus 12 months (P < 0.001) . Although no data on progression or disease specific survival were included, these findings are promising for the use of a neoadjuvant instillation of chemotherapy.
At the beginning, this clinical trial was intended to use only Mitomycin C as the only chemotherapeutic agent, but due to the stock break and shortage in Spain at the end of 2019, we have decided to propose the use of other drugs with the same indication and evidence that justifies its use in this disease (Epirubicin, Adriamycin, Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel). All the drugs mentioned before are authorized for use in intravesical instillations for the prevention of recurrences of urothelial bladder carcinoma, just like Mitomycin C, and none has shown superiority over another in clinical trials , , , , , . Every effort will be made to avoid excessive diversification between drugs and use Mitomycin C, Gemcitabine or Epirubicin whenever possible.
In this study we propose to carry out an intravesical instillation of chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant way (INAIC), that is, immediately before TURBT. If it were effective in prolonging disease-free intervals and reducing the recurrence rate, its use in urology departments would be easily adopted and it could benefit patients regardless of the extension and depth of the TURBT.
In any case, the administration, or not, of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will not influence the subsequent surgical treatment and the procedures in the follow-up of the patient in this clinical trial, which will be carried out according to the usual clinical practice, based on the risk groups.
If there is a considerable number of patients who will not be able to receive an IPOIC due to the previous mentioned contraindications and lack of use in clinical practice by urologists worldwide due to its complexity, it will not help to prolong their disease-free intervals. In this scenario, we should come out with a novel strategy, in which potentially all patients can benefit from chemotherapy.
In the light of this conclusion, we decide to create a randomized, open label, controlled trail, comparing the use of INAIC before TURB and compare the disease-free intervals with a control group. A protocol or results from a similar study have not been published in the medical literature so far.
Based on the evidence, we hypothesize that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may act on neoformative foci not visible due to their size during TURBT and may also reduce the possibility of tumor cell implantation by weakening floating tumor cells.
Patients in both arms will be followed-up according to standard clinical practice according to the guidelines established in our service: first cystoscopy and urine cytology at 3 months. Subsequently, the follow-up will be done according to the recommendations of the EAU guidelines .
We define early recurrence as a reappearance of the bladder tumor in the first 12 months after resection.
The subsequent treatment of NMIBC will be carried out according to the guidelines established in our service, regardless of the treatment group to which it has been assigned. Thus, intermediate-risk patients will be given intravesical prophylaxis treatment with MMC at a schedule of 40 mg weekly for the first 4 weeks (starting 2 weeks after TURB) followed by a monthly administration of 40 mg for 11 months.
We have started the study at the La Paz University Hospital in Madrid. Currently other centers who collaborate with the Club Urológico Español de Tratamiento Oncológico (CUETO) in Spain have decided to collaborate and are under the process of becoming approved enrollment centers.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 2:
|Inclusion criteria||Exclusion criteria|
|Both sexes, ≥ 18 years old, clinical and/or imaging evidence of localized papillary-type BCa with indication for TURBT.||Solid-looking or muscle-invasive tumors on cystoscopy and/or preoperative imaging tests|
|History of NMIBC: Ta / T1, G1-G3, without CIS, with disease-free interval > 6 months||Allergy to intravesical administered chemotherapeutic agents|
|Karnofsky scale score > 70%.||Pregnancy|
|Agreement of the patient to participate, signed informed consent.||Severe urethral stricture/stenosis or inability to catheterize the bladder for any other reason prior to TURBT|
|Patients in whom follow-up will not be possible for any reason.|
|Final diagnosis different from that of Ta-T1 tumors|
Patients randomized in the intervention group (Group A) will receive an INAIC through a 16Fr Foley catheter for 15 minutes right after the induction of anesthesia and prior to TURBT. The preferred agent for INAIC will be MMC 40 mg. In case that MMC is not available at the pharmacy, other approved agents are Epirrubicin, Gemcitabine, Adriamycin, Cisplatin and, Docetaxel.
The sample size is calculated to find a reduction of 15% in group A (INAIC + TURB) over group B (TURB alone), assuming that the recurrence rate in group B is 60%. A total of 120 patients will be required in each group, with a probability of 80% and a 5% type 1 error.
Patients will be assigned to 1 of the 2 groups using a computer-generated block randomization sequence. Participants will be intentionally placed in equal numbers to each group (A or B) according to a block of 4 (randomization ratio 1: 1 in each block). The randomization process will take place when the exact day and time of surgery is known (approximately 1 to 2 weeks prior to surgery).
At the time of registration, each patient will be assigned a Patient Number. This Patient Number will be noted on the electronic medical record and in the database. The researcher will be responsible for keeping adequate information about each patient so that health authorities can have access to such information if necessary. These records must be kept confidential during the period of time legally ordered by current regulations.
The documentation related to the study (protocol, database, signed informed consents, authorizations, etc) will be stored in the Urology Department at La Paz University Hospital in a safe place and easily accessible by the research team. All information contained in clinical, histological, biochemical, and molecular reports, observations, or other activities is necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the study.
The study started on May 2018, after obtaining the approval of the study by the Ethics Committee for Drug Research (CEIm) of the Hospital Universitario La Paz and the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS).
The study will be monitored by a monitor, who will draw up a suitable monitoring plan for the study. Regular visits and phone calls will be made to investigators. The monitor should evaluate the study procedures and discuss any problems with the investigator. During the course of the study, audit visits may be carried out at the participating centers.
The qualitative variables will be analyzed in 2x2 tables, they will be compared using the χ2 (Chi-square) test.
Main variable: The time to the recurrence of NIMCV will be analyzed between both groups using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank test and Cox regression. The recurrence rate per year will be defined as the total number of recurrences confirmed by pathological analysis divided by the number of years of follow-up. The recurrence rate per year between the two groups will be compared by Fisher's exact test or Student's t test.
Secondary variables: Univariate and multivariate analyzes will be performed to determine the factors that affect recurrence.
Two homogeneous groups will be generated (Group A and B) avoiding conformational biases (selection bias, attrition bias), through statistical analysis by intention to treat/stratified blocks, considering risk factors for recurrence (low and intermediate) based on in the latest reviews of scientific literature: sex, age, smoking history, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system status, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), tumor size, number of tumors, urinary cytology, history of previous NMIBC, history of previous intravesical chemotherapy treatment, adverse effects, surgical complications.
In order to minimize information biases (detection, confusion), multivariate analysis techniques will be used. In all the analyzes, a significance level (p) will be established at values below 0.05, that is, a 95% confidence interval.
The treatment, communication and transfer of the personal data of all the participating subjects will comply with the provisions of the Spanish Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13, on the protection of personal data.
The study will be carried out in accordance with the recommendations for clinical studies and drug evaluation in humans, which appear in the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki (Fortaleza, Brazil October 2013, Annex 3), revised in successive world assemblies, and the current Spanish Legislation on Clinical Studies (RD 1090/2015, of December 4, which regulates clinical trials with drugs).
This trial was approved by the Spanish agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) with the trial number: EudraCT 2017–004070-34. First approved: January 29th 2018. Last protocol version: 3.0 May 12th 2020.
Title of the clinical trial in Spanish: “Instilación vesical de qumioterapia previa a la resección transuretral de vejiga en el tratamiento del cáncer de vejiga”.
Link to the registration (must be publicly accessible): https://reec.aemps.es/reec/public/list.html
DMC and LMP wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DMC, JGR, CBR, MAM, FRB, AAB and LMP contributed to the conception and design of the study and, acquisition of data, critical revision of the manuscript, and final approval of the version to be submitted.
This clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain on December 22nd 2017 with the code: HULP:4963.
This study received funding from grants “Rafael Molla y Rodrigo” from the Foundation for Research in Urology (Spanish Urological Association) and Immunothercan-CM(B2017/BMD3733) from the Local Government of the Community of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C. and Rebelo, M. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 136: E359–E386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210 [PubMed]
Lopez-Beltran, A. (2008). Bladder cancer: clinical and pathological profile. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 42: 95–109, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03008880802325226
Ro, J., Staerkel, G. and Ayala, A. (1992). Cytologic and histologic features of superficial bladder cancer. Urol. Clin. North Am. 19: 435–453. [PubMed]
Sylvester, R.J., Van Der Meijden, A.P.M., Oosterlinck, W., Witjes, J.A., Bouffioux, C. and Denis, L. (2006). Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur. Urol. 49: 466–477, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.031 [PubMed]
M. Babjuk, M. Burger, E. Compérat, et al. EAU Guidelines: Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer 2020 | Uroweb n.d. https://uroweb.org/guideline/non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer/ (accessed April 2, 2020).
Herr, H.W. (2000). tumor progression and survival of patients with high grade, noninvasive papillary (TaG3) bladder tumors: 15-year outcome. J. Urol. 163: 60–62, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67972-4 [PubMed]
Sylvester, R.J., Oosterlinck, W. and Van Der Meijden, A.P.M. (2004). A single immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence in patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer: A meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials. J. Urol. 171: 2186–2190, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000125486.92260.b2 [PubMed]
Abern, M.R., Owusu, R.A., Anderson, M.R., Rampersaud, E.N. and Inman, B.A. (2013). Perioperative intravesical chemotherapy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11: 477–484, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2013.0060
Perlis, N., Zlotta, A.R., Beyene, J., Finelli, A., Fleshner, N.E. and Kulkarni, G.S. (2013). Immediate post-transurethral resection of bladder tumor intravesical chemotherapy prevents non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrences: an updated meta-analysis on 2548 patients and quality-of-evidence review. Eur. Urol. 64: 421–430, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.009 [PubMed]
Sylvester, R.J., Oosterlinck, W., Holmang, S., Sydes, M.R., Birtle, A. and Gudjonsson, S. (2016). Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a single immediate instillation of chemotherapy after transurethral resection with transurethral resection alone in patients with stage pTa-pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: which patients benefit from the instillation?. Eur. Urol. 69: 231–244, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.050 [PubMed]
Mahran, A., Bukavina, L., Mishra, K., Buzzy, C., Fish, M.L. and Bobrow, A. (2018). Bladder irrigation after transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Can. J. Urol. 25: 9579–9584. [PubMed]
Zhou, Z., Zhao, S., Lu, Y., Wu, J., Li, Y. and Gao, Z. (2019). Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of continuous saline bladder irrigation compared with intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumors. World J. Urol. 37: 1075–1084, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02628-7 [PubMed]
Pan, J.S., Slocum, H.K., Rustum, Y.M., Greco, W.R., Gaeta, J.F. and Huben, R.P. (1989). Inhibition of implantation of murine bladder tumor by thiotepa in cauterized bladder. J. Urol. 142: 1589–1593, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39174-7 [PubMed]
Brocks, C.P., Büttner, H. and Böhle, A. (2005). Inhibition of tumor implantation by intravesical gemcitabine in a murine model of superficial bladder cancer. J. Urol. 174: 1115–1118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000168657.51551.49 [PubMed]
J.R. Oddens, A.P.M. Van Der Meijden, R. Sylvester, One immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy in low risk Ta, T1 bladder cancer patients. Is it always safe? Eur Urol 2004;46:336–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.05.003.
Panach-Navarrete, J., Ferrandis-Cortés, C., Sales-Maicas, M. and Martínez-Jabaloyas, J. (2015). [Mitomycin extravasation after postoperative instillation] – PubMed. Arch. Esp. Urol. 68: 633–636. [PubMed]
Koya, M.P., Simon, M.A. and Soloway, M.S. (2006). Complications of intravesical therapy for urothelial cancer of the bladder. J. Urol. 175: 2004–2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00264-3 [PubMed]
Madeb, R., Golijanin, D., Noyes, K., Fisher, S., Stephenson, J.J. and Long, S.R. (2009). Treatment of nonmuscle invading bladder cancer: do physicians in the United States practice evidence based medicine? The use and economic implications of intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Cancer 115: 2660–2670, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24311 [PubMed]
Chamie, K., Saigal, C.S., Lai, J., Hanley, J.M., Setodji, C.M. and Konety, B.R. (2011). Compliance with guidelines for patients with bladder cancer: variation in the delivery of care. Cancer 117: 5392–5401, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26198 [PubMed]
Cookson, M.S., Chang, S.S., Oefelein, M.G., Gallagher, J.R., Schwartz, B. and Heap, K. (2012). National practice patterns for immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J. Urol. 187: 1571–1576, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.056 [PubMed]
Palou-Redorta, J., Rouprêt, M., Gallagher, J.R., Heap, K., Corbell, C. and Schwartz, B. (2014). The use of immediate postoperative instillations of intravesical chemotherapy after TURBT of NMIBC among European countries. World J. Urol. 32: 525–530, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1142-z [PubMed]
Di Stasi, S.M., Valenti, M., Verri, C., Liberati, E., Giurioli, A. and Leprini, G. (2011). Electromotive instillation of mitomycin immediately before transurethral resection for patients with primary urothelial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 12: 871–879, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70190-5 [PubMed]
Chen, C.-H., Yang, H.-J., Shun, C.-T., Huang, C.-Y., Huang, K.-H. and Yu, H.-J. (2012). A cocktail regimen of intravesical mitomycin-C, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MDP) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 30: 421–427, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.06.012
Maffezzini, M., Campodonico, F., Canepa, G., Capponi, G. and Fontana, V. (2007). Short-schedule intravesical gemcitabine with ablative intent in recurrent Ta-T1, G1–G2, low- or intermediate-risk, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Eur. Urol. 51: 956–961, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.038 [PubMed]
Sternberg, I.A., Dalbagni, G., Chen, L.Y., Donat, S.M., Bochner, B.H. and Herr, H.W. (2013). Intravesical gemcitabine for high risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment failure. J. Urol. 190: 1686–1691, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.120 [PubMed]
Shelley, M.D., Jones, G., Cleves, A., Wilt, T.J., Mason, M.D. and Kynaston, H.G. (2012). Intravesical gemcitabine therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): a systematic review. BJU Int. 109: 496–505, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10880.x [PubMed]
Laudano, M.A., Barlow, L.J., Murphy, A.M., Petrylak, D.P., Desai, M. and Benson, M.C. (2010). Long-term clinical outcomes of a phase I trial of intravesical docetaxel in the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer refractory to standard intravesical therapy. Urology 75: 134–137, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.112 [PubMed]
|Primary registry and trial identification number||EudraCT 2017–004070-34|
|Date of authorization in primary registry||January 29th 2018|
|Sources of monetary of financial support||Supported by grants from the Foundation for Research in Urology (Spanish Urological Association) and from the Community of Madrid (Immunothercan-CM(B2017/BMD3733)|
|Sponsor||Dr. Luis Martínez-Piñeiro Lorenzo – Urology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain|
|Contact for public firstname.lastname@example.org
|Study type||Phase IV, randomized, open label, controlled|
|Public title||Instilación vesical de qumioterapia previa a la resección transuretral de vejiga en el tratamiento del cáncer de vejiga|
|Scientific title||Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, abierto para evaluar la instilación vesical de quimioterapia neoadyuvante a la resección transuretral de vejiga para la prevención de recurrencia del carcinoma urotelial no músculo invasivo|
|Countries of recruitment||Spain|
|Interventions||Group A: instilation of intravesical chemotherapy immediately prior to TURBT. Group B: control|
|Date of first patient enrolled||May 29th 2018|
|Recruitment status||Patient enrollment ongoing|
|Key inclusion criteria||Age ≥ 18 years, any gender
Localized, papillary-type, bladder carcinoma
Disease free interval > 6 months (only Ta/T1,G1G3, without CIS)
|Key exclusion criteria||Solid or muscle invasive tumors
Allergy to intravesical chemotherapeutics agents
Any reason for not being able to catheterize the bladder prior to surgery
|Primary outcome||Evaluate early recurrence rate (<12 months)|
|Secondary outcomes||Evaluate toxicity, adverse events and complications Determine late recurrence rate (12–60)
Determine the late recurrence rate (12–60 months) Compare the recurrence-free interval
Determine clinical and demographic variables that could influence clinical response
Determine differences in rate of recurrence, adverse effects and other variables between patients in the intervention group who have received different drugs